Tuesday, March 18, 2014



PLEASE SIGN ALL THE 
#BANTRAPPING PETITIONS HERE:
Let's put an end to this practice in the U.S.A.
Thank you.



( USA ) GOVERNMENT SPENDS $100M 
PREYING ON BUSINESS IN PURSUIT 
OF WOLVES


http://stopusdawsabuse.blogspot.com/2014/03/government-spends-100m-preying-on.html


Posted on September 30, 2013 
by TWIN Observer
BY Laura Kiesel

BOSTON (MainStreet) http://www.mainstreet.com/

 — What could be done with $100 million dollars? As it turns out, a lot of bloodshed.

That is how much is spent every year by Wildlife Services, a branch of the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, 
http://www.predatordefense.org/USDA.htm
to kill hundreds of thousands of animals.

The species most commonly targeted by Wildlife Services’ lethal control program are predators such as wolves, bears, coyote and mountain lions. An estimated 100,000 native carnivores are killed each year, with approximately 2 million animals killed since 2000.

The purpose is often to prevent losses of either livestock or game species such as deer and elk that are popular targets for hunters. Some of the methods used for controlling predators include trapping, aerial gunning, denning (killing young in their dens) and using poisons such as Compound 1080 or sodium cyanide M-44.

“Driven by narrow agricultural interests, these predator control activities often ignore the greater public need for a healthy environment, fiscal responsibility and safe public lands, raising some serious questions about how the program is being administered,” says a press release from the Natural Resources Defense Council, 
http://www.nrdc.org/wildlife/animals/wolves/predatorcontrol.asp
which holds the position that Wildlife Services is wrongfully scapegoating predators.

USDA Wildlife Services is distinct as the only federal program that markets its services — killing native predators native predators and other “nuisance” wildlife — to ranchers, state wildlife management agencies and even corporations, despite a mission “to resolve wildlife conflicts to allow people and wildlife to coexist.” It not only seems contradictory as a mission; it has also caused several conservation groups to accuse Wildlife Services of having a profit-driven conflict of interest.

The program is so notorious that last year it became the subject of a three-part expose in The Sacramento Bee by Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Tom Knudson. 
http://www.sacbee.com/2012/06/25/4586191/efforts-to-investigate-wildlife.html
He found that the programs went on with minimal monitoring and also killed tens of thousands of non-target animals, including cats, dogs and river otters.

“There will obviously be times when livestock and predators come into conflict, when coyotes kill lambs and black bears become too accustomed to humans and cause genuine harm,” began a scathing editorial on the Wildlife Services program that appeared in The New York Times 
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/18/opinion/agricultures-misnamed-agency.html?_r=1&
this past summer, “But Wildlife Services’ lethal damage is broad and secretive.”


This entry was posted in Other Sources, Wolves in the News by TWIN Observer. 
http://www.thestreet.com/story/12052167/1/government-spends-100m-preying-on-business-in-pursuit-of-wolves.html?cm_ven=GOOGLEN

http://www.timberwolfinformation.org/government-spends-100m-preying-on-business-in-pursuit-of-wolves/#comment-29781

No comments:

Post a Comment